谢耘 (YUN XIE)

  谢耘博士,1999年至2006年在华东师范大学哲学系学习,先后取得哲学学士学位(现代哲学方向)和哲学硕士学位(逻辑学专业),其间于2004年至2006年入选“华东师范大学-法国巴黎高等师范学院联合培养研究生项目”,修读欧洲研究(当代社会学)方向硕士课程班结业。2009年毕业于中山大学哲学系,获逻辑学专业博士学位。2009年至2011年在中山大学社会学与人类学学院开展博士后研究,2011年起受聘中山大学哲学系。现为哲学系副教授,逻辑与认知研究所专职研究人员。主要理论兴趣涉及非形式逻辑、当代论证理论、批判性思维以及认知与文化研究。

 

学术兼职 (Academic Activities)

  Editorial Board Member of Journal of Argumentation in Context (John Benjamins) (2012 - )

  Core Member (Researcher), International Learned Institute for Argumentation Studies (ILIAS)(2015 - )

  Scientific Panel Member, the European Conference on Argumentation (ECA 2015, 2017)

  教育部高等学校文化素质教育指导委员会批判性思维和创新教育分指导委员会(筹)委员(2014 - )

  Program Committee Member, The Second Chinese Conference on Logic and Argumentation (CLAR) (2018)

研究兴趣: 

非形式逻辑、当代论证理论、批判性思维、认知与文化研究

代表性论文: 
  •  Yun Xie:“Conductive Argument as a Mode of Strategic Maneuvering”, Informal Logic 37(1), 2017: pp.2-22. 【This paper wins the 2016 AILACT Essay Prize, The Association for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking】
     
  •  Yun Xie, Dale Hample, Xiaoli Wang:“A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Argument Predispositions in China: Argumentativeness, Verbal Aggressiveness, Argument Frames, and Personalization of Conflict”, Argumentation 29(3), 2015: pp.265-284. [SpringerLink]
     
  •   谢耘:“当代论证理论的社会文化维度拓展”,《中山大学学报(社会科学版)》,2015年第1期。 ["Exploring the Social-cultural Dimension in Contemporary Argumentation Studies", Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Social Science Edition) 2015(1), pp.145-152.][PDF]
     
  •   谢耘,熊明辉:“图尔敏的逻辑观述略”,《哲学研究》,2013年第8期。 ["Exploring Toulmin's View on Logic", Philosophical Studies 2013(8), pp.66-71.]  [PDF]
     
  •   谢耘:“作为理性证成的论证——论证的批判性之维探析”,《现代哲学》,2013年第5期。 ["Argument as Rational Justification", Modern Philosophies 2013(5), pp.76-81.] [PDF]
     
  •  Yun Xie: "Review of Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory", Informal Logic 32(4), 2012, pp. 440-453. [PDF]
     
  •   谢耘:“当代西方论证理论概观”,《哲学动态》,2012年第8期。 ["Contemporary Argumentation Theory: An Overview", Philosophical Trends 2012(8), pp.102-108.] [PDF]
     
  •  Yun Xie, Minghui Xiong: "Whose Toulmin? And Which Logic: A Response to van Benthem", Cogency 4(2), 2012. pp.115-134. [PDF]
     
  •  Zhaoshi Zeng, Yun Xie: "Liang Qichao’s Research Paradigm and the Study of History of Logic in China", Studies in Logic 2012(1), pp.113-125] [PDF]
     
  •  Qinying Liang, Yun Xie: "How Critical is the Dialectical Tier - Exploring the Critical Dimension in the Dialectical Tier", Argumentation 25(2), 2011, pp. 229-242.  [SpringerLink]
     
  •   谢耘:“作为程序与属性的论辩术——析当代论证理论中‘论辩术’视角的差异解读”,《逻辑学研究》,2010年第4期;转载于《中国社会科学文摘》,2011年第5期。 ["Becoming Dialectical: Procedure and Property", Studies in Logic 2010(4), pp.85-97.] [PDF]
     
  •   谢耘:“论证逻辑、非形式逻辑、论证理论”,《自然辩证法研究》,2008年第3期;转载于《人大复印资料·逻辑》,2008年第4期。 ["Logic of Argument, Informal Logic, and Theory of Argument", Studies in Dialectics of Nature 2008(3), pp.38-43.]
     
  •   谢耘:“论证、论辩、争论――当代论证理论视域中论证概念的双重维度解读”,《自然辩证法研究》,2007年第4期。 ["Argument, Argumentation, and Disputation: Exploring the conceptualization of argument in contemporary argumentation studies", Studies in Dialectics of Nature 2007(4), pp.26-30.]

 

文集论文 (Contributions to Proceedings)
 

  •   Yun Xie: [1] "Arguing Conductively, or Arguing Strategically?", [2]"Commentary on Wagemans' Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments'", in Bondy, P., & Benacquista, L. (Eds.). Argumentation, Objectivity, and Bias: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. Windsor, ON: OSSA,2016.
     
  •   Yun Xie: [1] (with Shuying Shi, Sarah Evans, Dale Hample) "Exploring the meaning of argument in China", [2] (with Minghui Xiong): "Commentary on J. A. Blair's 'Are conductive arguments really not possible?'" [Link], in Mohammed, D. & Lewiński, M. (Eds.). Virtues of Argumentation, Ontario: University of Windsor, 2013.
     
  •   Minghui Xiong,Yun Xie: "Logics for litigation argumentation", in J. van Benthem, Fenrong Liu (eds.) Logic Across the University: Foundations and Applications, College Publications, 2013, pp. 483-493.
     
  •   谢耘,熊明辉:“图尔敏抛弃了逻辑学吗?”,载苏庆辉、彭孟尧 主编,《知识与逻辑2012》,台北:学富文化出版社,2012年6月。 ["Did Toulmin abandon Logic?", in Qinghui Su, Mengyao Peng (eds.) Knowledge and Logic 2012, 2012, pp.81-92.]
     
  •   Yun Xie: "Dialectic within Pragma-Dialectics and Informal Logic", in Takeshi Suzuki, Takayuki Kato & Aya Kubota (Eds.), Argumentation, the Law and Justice (pp. 280-286), Tokyo: Japan Debate Association, 2008.

     

出版专(译)著: 
  •   Ju, S., Löwe, B., Müller, Th., Xie, Y.(eds.): Cultures of Mathematics and Logic, Springer-Birkhäuser, October, 2016.
     
  •   熊明辉,谢耘 主编:《中国批创思维发展报告(2015)》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2016年12月。[M.Xiong & Y.Xie (eds.): Annual Report on Critical and Creative Thinking in China (2015), Beijing: China Social Science Press, December, 2016.]
     
  •   熊明辉,谢耘 主编:《法律论证与修辞》,北京:法律出版社,2014年1月。[M.Xiong & Y.Xie (eds.): Legal Argumentation and Rhetoric, Beijing: Law Press China, Jan, 2014.]
     
  •   【译著】雅普·哈赫 著, 谢耘 译:《法律逻辑研究》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2015年7月。[Jaap Hage: Studies in Legal Logic, (Translated into Chinese), Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, July 2015.]
     
  •   【译文】弗兰斯·范爱默伦:从“批判性讨论”的理想模型到具体情境中的论证性会话——“语用论辩术”论证理论的逐步发展,《逻辑学研究》,2015年第2期。 [Frans H. van Eemeren: “From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-step Development of the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation”, (trans. into Chinese) Studies in Logic 2015(2), pp.70-97.] [PDF]
     
  •   【译文】图尔敏:“逻辑与论证评价”,《工业与信息化教育》,2015年第7期(批判性思维专刊)。[S. Toulmin: "Logic and the criticism of arguments", Industry and Information Technology Education, 2015(7), pp.28-41. (Special Issue on Criticial Thinking)]
     
  •   【译文】佩雷尔曼:“司法推理”,载熊明辉、谢耘 主编,《法律论证与修辞》,北京:法律出版社,2014年1月。 [Perelman: "Judicial Reasoning", in Minghui Xiong, Yun Xie (eds.) Legal Argumentation and Rhetoric, 2014, pp.33-40.]

     

讲授课程: 

本科生课程(Courses for Undergraduates)
   
  逻辑学导论(Introduction to Logic)
  非形式逻辑导论(Introduction to Informal Logic)
  逻辑与批判性思维(Logic and Critical Thinking)

研究生课程(Courses for Graduates)

  非形式逻辑研讨班(Informal Logic Seminar)