逸仙逻辑讲坛第四十六期｜Frans H. van Eemeren：论证话语中的合理性与取效性

主讲人简介 

Frans H. van Eemeren，阿姆斯特丹大学言语传播学、论证理论与修辞学荣誉退休教授，莱顿大学教授。与Rob Grootendorst（1944-2000）共同创立了极具影响力的语用论辩论证理论。担任国际论证研究学会（ISSA）主席、跨学科期刊《论证》（Argumentation）（Springer出版）与《语境中的论证》（Argumentation in Context）（John Benjamins出版）主编。美国国家传播学协会杰出学者、富布赖特教授等，于2013年被荷兰王室授予尼德兰之狮勋章。

讲座摘要 
Argumentative discourse is instrumental in the resolution of differences of opinion on the merits that is a requirement for intellectual, social and cultural progress. Argumentation theorists can get a grip on the process of resolving a difference on the merits by projecting the conduct of an imagined critical discussion on the discourse. A critical discussion consists of four dialectical stages in which specific argumentative moves are made, which are conveyed in different kinds of communicative acts. Arguers always need to maneuver strategically to meet the Argumentative Predicament by strategically combining the simultaneous pursuit of rhetorical effectiveness with maintaining dialectical reasonableness. According to Pragma-Dialectics, the aim of argumentative discourse is not just achieving persuasiveness, but convincingness, i.e. effectiveness through reasonableness. Effectiveness legitimized by reasonableness can be achieved by observing a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse which prevents the occurrence of fallacies. For this purpose, in all three aspects of the strategic maneuvering taking place in all argumentative moves that are made in argumentative discourse all ten rules of the code of conduct need to be complied with.